What is the nature of scientific reasoning, according to Bronowski

Must have ( The Norton Reader 13th ed. )be able to answer some questions regarding these readings:–Henry David Thoreau, Where I Lived, and What I Lived For (1098)-Jacob Bronowski, The Nature of Scientific Reasoning (886)-Stephen Hawking, Is Everything Determined? (908) http://research.uvu.edu/albrecht-crane/486RKafka/Nietzsche.pdf (ONLINE)Here are the questions:-1. What is the nature of scientific reasoning, according to Bronowski? What role does imagination play? Does this differ from the picture painted by Weinberg? .2. Why does Thoreau call the average person a sleeper? How does this lifestyle differ from living deliberately?3. There are some striking parallels among The Allegory of the Cave, Existentialism, and Where I Lived, and What I Lived For. What are they?4.There was progress made regarding Sartres notion of lawmakers, but Id like to take this opportunity to lay out exactly what Sartre means. Whenever we perform an action we implicitly make a statement about reality. If we say that we believe in gravity, for example, we also say something about the trustworthiness of science, observational evidence, mathematics, our perceptions, and history. We are saying something about how the universe operates on a large scale while staking a great deal of faith in our own ability to accurately perceive that universe. Every one of our beliefs are, by necessity, part of a much larger belief system, and every time we perform an action we make a statement about the nature of reality. Thus, when we engage the world, even in the most rudimentary ways, we expect others to participate in the universe weve envisioned, the world as we see it. And the more people we can get to agree with us, the more canonical and binding our beliefs become. Subsequently, if we are born into a capitalist economy, we are expected to value money. If we are born into a heteronormative society, we are expected to act straight. If we are born into a world that fetishizes scientific knowledge, labeling Newtons theory of gravity as a law of nature, we are expected to regard the scientific theories of our age as self-evident. This is why Sartre calls every person a lawmaker. If we engage the world, we do so as creators and sustainers of truth, expecting others to participate in the reality weve constructed. .So why has Western culture, at large, resisted Einsteins ideas about gravity, and how does this relate to Sartres notion of lawmakers? Does this tell us anything about how truth functions in culture?For anyone whos curious, this video explains general relativity pretty well: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEZupmpTcOU. Basically, orbiting planets are traveling along curved space created by the Sun. Gravitational pull is a myth. 5. What is Hawkings argument, in a nutshell?6. What is Nietzsches argument, in a nutshell?7. What makes scientific knowledge and empirical observation untrustworthy, in Nietzsches opinion?8. How does Nietzsches notion of truth relate to The Allegory of the Cave and Sartres notion of lawmakers?.

Focus Essays has been there for more than 10 years to offer students like you academic writing services.

Get our experience by placing an order with us and use the discount code PAPER15 to get 15% discount on all orders.

We deliver URGENT ORDERS within 6 hours. Get a quotation from the calculator below.