PAPER REVIEW

REPORT STRUCTURE:

The report has to have all of the sections listed below, unless it is indicated otherwise:
Cover page
1. Copy of the cover page (e.g., 1st page) of the original paper to be reviewed
2. Review
3. Full bibliographic information for the reviewed paper and explanation on how it was accessed.
References (if any)

Paper assigned is:

“Leaning to the Left Makes the Eiffel Tower Seem Smaller: Posture-Modulated Estimation,” Anita Eerland, Tulio M.
Guadalupe and Rolf A. Zwaan, Psychological Science (December 2011)

————————————————————————–

REPORT APPEARANCE AND SUBMISSION
Project reports have to be submitted in both hard copy and electronically, however the electronic copy submitted via CLEW
is considered as a backup. The primary copy is a hard (printed) copy. It has to be provided by the due date either in class or
in the IMSE office in EH 236 (ask the secretary for a time stamp).
The hard copy of the final report submitted for grading has to have professional appearance, including the following:
Has to be typeset in word processing program
Main report body has to be printed on white 8.5Ã—11 paper; single sided b&w printing (color printing optional).
Have two covers (front and back) printed on cardboard stock
Have a transparent plastic front cover
Be bound with either spiral or comb binding (stapling or using a threering binder does not count as binding

Assignment criteria:

I. REVIEW [1.5 pages]
Prepare a concise review of the assigned paper, not exceeding 1.5 typewritten pages (font size 12 and 1.5 spacing). It should have approximately 8001000 words. In terms of review structure, try to answer the following questions:
What issue/problem are the authors of the paper addressing? Quote a sentence (or longer passage) from the text
that you think is central to the author’s (or authors’) implicit or explicit argument(s). Cite the page on which it
appears.
Why is it important? What are the implications? In a few sentences, state the author’s explicit or implicit
argument. Be sure to include both: what the author is arguing for, and what s/he is arguing against.
What method(s) did the authors use to build support for their argument, e.g., how were the data collected, how
were they analyzed and to what effect (e.g., what practical evidence was created either for or against the original
argument)?
What are the key conclusions and their implications? Suggest what the conclusions drawn by the authors imply for
understanding or improving society, relations between individuals, groups or technology.
Raise a question which you think is not fully, or satisfactorily, answered by the text. The question should be a
question of interpretation or of inquiry, not simply a question of fact.
Say, in a few lines only, how the paper confirms or contradicts your own experience or common sense.

II. FULL BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION OF THE REVIEWED PAPER AND INFO ON HOW IT WAS ACCESSED [0.5 pages]
Provide the full bibliographic details of the reviewed paper, using the following format (also called Harvard style):
[1] Author(s), Publication/Book title, Journal/Publisher, Year (and page numbers if it is a technical paper)
[2] Website XYZ viewed on a particular date DDMMYY
Explain the procedure by which you have retrieves the full copy of the paper (e.g., copy from the library collection, online database, etc..). Also provide the access timestamp (date).

REFERENCES [0.5 pages]
If you refer to other publications (books, papers, etc.), reference them here. Follow the same Harvard style referenceing as
before. Commonly used general rules of citing sources and references can be found at the following website
http://www.aresearchguide.com/styleguides.html

Please, I want you to upload the original papers too.

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
Uncategorized