Preferred language style: English (U.K.)
I have three critique papers. The first article ((Farrell, Kadous and Towry (2008) (Advocate Role: Feng, Critic Role: Tere)))) is purely a critique paper that require the following: to Prepare your summary from the advocate and critic perspectives and then come to a conclusion about the paper. In accordance with the seminar guide the approach to take in these roles is as follows: Advocate: In this role you should go beyond just summarising the article. Your primary focus should be on the strengths of the paper in terms of its contribution in advancing accounting theory, practice, and/or education. What do we learn from the study that is valuable? Critic: In this role you should focus on the weaknesses and limitations of the study. While your role is to be critical, you should strive to provide constructive criticism. How could the study be improved? Use the general critiquing framework as a guide ( will be attached with the article) . I need you to write a critique of the article for two pages single line taking into account the directory information in the general critiquing framework.
The second Article Coletti, Sedatole and Towry (2005) is a question/ answer critique article that just require answering 4 questions from the article to be answered in two single line pages.
The third Article for Rankin, Schwartz and Young (2008) is a question/ answer critique article that just require answering 4 questions from the article to be answered in two single line pages . I will attach the following 1- Word doc that has questions for article 2 and 3 coupled with the General Critiquing Framework info. 1- the three critique article